When I’m with a cardiologist, I feel like I’m poring over the scattered pieces of a really complicated puzzle while an hour-glass empties beside me. What symptoms are relevant? What symptoms are even symptoms? What have my other doctors told him, and what have they forgotten or neglected to communicate? (A lot, it turns out.) Even after what was a very productive meeting with Dr. Cufflinks on Monday, I awoke at 5 o’clock yesterday morning thinking, “shit – I knew I’d forgotten something important.”
It’s never like this with my rheumatologist. I know my RA intimately. Our relationship is 24 years old, after all, and I think I have a good understanding of the way this disease works in my body. There’s something strangely comforting about pain when it’s just doing what it’s always done. It feels right, somehow.
RA is also a more or less concrete diagnosis, or at least it has been for me. And when my parents learned I had it, I was far too young to agonize over the nuances of the diagnostic process. Now that I’ve lived with it for so long and come to know it so well, I wouldn’t doubt its reality for a second. I’ve got the pain and the permanent damage to prove it; you can't really waffle about fused wrists and crooked fingers.
Not so with HCM or whatever else may be going on with my heart. It’s only been three years since my uncle died; three years of contradicting statements from doctors, inconclusive procedures, specialists who don’t speak to one another and admissions that there’s just not a lot of concrete knowledge about many arrhythmia disorders. I value that honesty greatly, but at the same time, it’s not exactly ideal for someone like me who already tends to be a little on the obsessive side.
I know Dr. Sneakers doesn’t talk to Dr. Cufflinks about me – despite their working in such close proximity that the three of us bumped into one another in the hallway this week. He had no idea I’m supposed to be repeating my procainamide infusion, and the thing that woke me in the wee hours was the fact that I’m pretty sure he also doesn’t know about the abnormal EKG I had with Dr. Sneakers in September.
The good thing is that on Monday it finally felt like Dr. C and I moved beyond the “catch-up” stage. We were no longer just trying to make sense of all the tests I’d had at other hospitals, the medications I’d been prescribed by other doctors, the diagnoses given and then revoked. He was finally treating
me, and he was treating me as
he saw fit after getting to know me and reviewing my history thoroughly for himself. And he’d clearly been thinking and reading and talking about me between my last appointment and Monday’s. I’ve had doctors I’d been seeing for years walk into the room and ask me my name. It’s good to know he’s not one of those.
Yesterday,
WarmSocks wrote about her journey with RA and her own somewhat fuzzier diagnosis:
When I first got sick, I was desperate for an answer: “What is wrong with me and when will I get better?” It no longer matters what the exact label is. Many of the autoimmune diseases are treated the same way. I’m taking a more pragmatic approach now: what do I have to do in order to function?
This is where I want to be. I think sometimes I conflate my RA and my cardiac conditions into one big lumpy “chronic illness” that I should have figured out by now. In reality, though, the whole heart thing is still pretty new to me, and maybe I need to recognize that it will be a long time before I feel as comfortable in the cardiology department as I do in rheumatology.
When I see Dr. Sneakers for my infusion test, I’ll just ask him to please, pretty please discuss the EKG with Dr. Cufflinks. And if it's 6 months before he knows? Oh well.
In the meantime, I shall attempt to take a chill pill.